COMPETENCE IS MY WATCHWORD.
The trust and confidence your leaders and soldiers have in you is based
not only on who you are, but on what you know and what you are able to do. In
the course of its more than 200 years of distinguished service, the Army has
identified a framework for leadership development and assessment. The framework
consists of nine leadership competencies which establish broad categories
of skills, knowledge and attitudes that define leader
behavior.
Communication
Issue clear, concise
orders
Receive/interpret information
Supervision
Lead
soldiers/units
Maintain
control/accountability
Teaching/Counseling
Teach
individual/collective training
Evaluate performance oriented
training
Coach and provide feedback
Soldier-Team
Development
Develop unit cohesion
Foster loyalty and
commitment
Build esprit and confidence
Lead physical fitness
training
Technical/Tactical Proficiency
Perform skill level
tasks
Qualify with weapon/equipment
Navigate
Perform and direct
maintenance
Decision Making
Use problem solving
process
Planning
Plan individual/collective
training
Use of Available Systems
Use automated data
processing or other computerized systems
Professional
Ethics
Lead by example
Practice professional Army
ethics
Display high personal/professional
standards.
MY TWO BASIC RESPONSIBILITIES WILL ALWAYS BE UPPERMOST IN MY MIND -
ACCOMPLISHMENT OF MY MISSION AND THE WELFARE OF MY
SOLDIERS.
Your unit is your piece of
the Army's action, your day-to-day part of the Army, and where you exercise the
competencies you've developed. By training your soldiers, you contribute to your
unit's mission and combat readiness, and thus to the defense of the
nation.

The
unit is your family, your team. You have certain responsibilities to your team
by virtue of the position you hold. A primary responsibility is to take care
of your soldiers. You do this by developing a genuine concern for their
well-being. In the Army, this means that you must know and understand your
soldiers well enough to train them to a high level of proficiency as individuals
and teams, and employ them within their capabilities.
Individual
training is your primary job. You must develop trained soldiers who have
discipline, are physically strong, mentally tough, and highly motivated. You
must train your soldiers on every task critical to wartime mission
accomplishment, because they must be confident in their ability to perform well
under the difficult and demanding conditions of battle. Effective training is
the key to sustaining the mobility, deployability, and lethality of today's
combat-ready Army.
I WILL STRIVE TO REMAIN TACTICALLY AND TECHNICALLY
PROFICIENT.
Before training your
soldiers, you must know your job. Usually, this means obtaining a combination of
both technical and tactical knowledge. You need to become technically proficient
in order to successfully perform all tasks and functions related to your
position. Including the ability to operate and maintain all assigned equipment.
Tactical proficiency comes when you are able to skillfully employ your soldiers
and their equipment, and when you understand your commander's intent and the
Army's current warfighting doctrine.
There are three pillars of leader
development: institutional training, operational assignments and
self-development. Commanders and senior NCOs all share responsibility to
provide opportunities and guidance to you by training, promoting, and utilizing
you in positions of increasing responsibility. They will ensure that you have
the time and preparation necessary to attend and excel at each of the schools in
the Noncommissioned Officer Education System.
However, you must seek and
take responsibility for your own actions, and maximize your own development as
opportunities occur. Self-development, through college courses or other programs
designed to improve your leadership abilities, is your
responsibility.
The nine leadership competencies and the skills,
knowledge, and attitudes you must possess at each skill level are powerful
developmental tools for you and your soldiers. They provide a universal standard
for you and all other leaders throughout the Army.
Leadership is linked
to knowledge. The confidence your soldiers have in your tactical and technical
proficiency will affect your ability to train and lead them. Your soldiers will
know whether you are knowledgeable in a given area and will take pride in the
fact that you have the experience or know-how to train and lead them. Your
technical and tactical proficiency are, therefore, keys to their respect, trust,
and confidence in you as a leader.

I AM AWARE OF MY ROLE AS A NONCOMMISSIONED OFFICER. I WILL FULFILL MY
RESPONSIBILITIES INHERENT IN THAT ROLE.
Though training and leading soldiers are your main responsibilities, you
have other responsibilities to your commander, the unit and the United States
Army. Since the time of Baron Von Steuben's "Regulations for the Order and
Discipline of the Troops of the United States," NCOs have had the responsibility
and authority for ensuring order and discipline.
As an NCO, you have
two types of authority: command and general military. These
authorities give you the legitimate power to direct your soldiers, to take
action required by your leadership position, or to enforce good order and
discipline.
You have command authority anytime you fill a position
requiring the direction and control of soldiers. However, you use that authority
only with the soldiers and facilities in your own unit. Tank commanders, squad
leaders, platoon sergeants, and dining facility managers all use command
authority when they issue orders to direct and control.
Another source of
your command authority stems from the combination of the chain of command and
the NCO support channel, of which you are a part. The chain of command passes
orders and policies through the NCO support channel to provide you with the
authority to do your job.
General military authority originates in
oaths of office, law, rank structure, traditions, and regulations. For example,
the UCMJ gives authority to commissioned officers, warrant officers, petty
officers, and noncommissioned officers to maintain order and
discipline.
This broad-based authority allows you to take appropriate
corrective actions whenever any service member, anywhere, commits an act
involving a breach of good order or discipline. When you stop soldiers from
another battalion who are outside without proper headgear, you have a duty and
obligation to enforce established standards and
regulations.
ALL SOLDIERS ARE ENTITLED TO OUTSTANDING LEADERSHIP; I WILL PROVIDE THAT
LEADERSHIP.
Not long ago you were
"one of the troops." Now, you are an NCO, and there is a vast difference between
your soldiers and you - a difference far beyond new stripes, more pay, and a
different title. Those official promotion orders changed the whole fabric of
what the Army and its soldiers expect of you.
You are still responsible
for your own skills, but now you are also responsible for the skills of those
you lead. This means that you must train your soldiers in whatever skills they
may lack.
You are still responsible for following orders, but now you
give orders as a leader of a squad, a crew, a team, or section. This means that
you are no longer a "doer," but that you get things done through the efforts of
others.
You must make sound and timely decisions to ensure the task is
understood, supervised and accomplished. That is what outstanding leadership is
all about; establishing and enforcing standards and providing purpose,
direction, and motivation for you soldiers.

I KNOW MY SOLDIERS, AND I WILL ALWAYS PLACE THEIR NEEDS ABOVE MY
OWN.
Part of providing the purpose,
direction and motivation for your soldiers is deciding which of the three
leadership styles will best meet their needs. You have to be yourself, yet
flexible enough to adjust to the soldiers you lead and to the missions assigned
to you.
Some soldiers say they admire a certain sergeant because that NCO
always seems to know exactly what to do in a particular situation. Others admire
a leader who knows just the right words to say at the right tome to ensure
mission accomplishment and soldier care.
Experience has taught you that
you should not deal with all people the same. For example, you know it is not
effective to deal with a new soldier the same way you would deal with an
experienced tank commander or section chief, and vice versa.
Directing
When time is short and only you know what
needs doing and how to do it, the directing style is the best way to
accomplish the mission. When leading soldiers who lack experience or competence
at a time-critical task, you need to tell them what, how, where, and when you
want it done.
Participating
If your soldiers have some competence
in a given task and support your goals, allowing them to participate in
decisions can create a powerful team-building process. In this case, the
participating style of leadership may be most effective. Asking your
soldiers for information and recommendations before you make your decision will
help build their confidence and increase their support for the final
plan.
Delegating
When your soldiers are mature, competent
and motivated to perform a particular task, you may feel comfortable enough to
try the delegating style of leadership. Handing over your problem-solving
and decision-making authority to a soldier or group of soldiers does not release
you from being accountable for the task, but it does help them build confidence
in their own abilities. When you allow them to make final decisions or solve a
problem on their own, it shows that you have confidence in them, and it
reinforces the principles of cohesion and teamwork.
There is no one best
style. What works for you in one situation may not work in another. You must
develop the flexibility to use all three styles and the judgment to choose the
style that best meets the situation and the needs of your
soldiers.
I WILL COMMUNICATE CONSISTENTLY WITH MY SOLDIERS AND NEVER LEAVE THEM
UNIFORMED.
Your ability to
effectively communicate with your soldiers is just as important as your style of
leadership.
Communication, the fourth major leadership factor, occurs
when others understand exactly what you are trying to tell them, and when you
understand precisely what they are trying to tell you. You must recognize that
you communicate standards by your example and by what behaviors you ignore,
reward, and punish.
Leadership is more than setting the example and
bravely leading a charge. Your ability to say the correct thing, at the
appropriate moment and in the right way, is a very important part of leading and
caring for your soldiers.
In peacetime, you must create a bond with your
soldiers that will cause them to follow you and conduct themselves properly in
combat. You must win their trust and confidence before, rather than after,
combat has commenced. What and how you communicate either builds or harms the
strength of the relationship between you and your soldiers. In wartime, you must
clearly communicate the mission to your soldiers. If they are to think
creatively on the battlefield, they must have a clear concept of the
"Objective." They must have all the accurate information that headquarters
(platoon and above) can supply about the enemy and other factors that affect the
mission.
American soldiers do best when they know why they are doing
something. Individual soldiers have changed the outcome of battle using
initiative in the absence of orders. Keeping your soldiers informed helps them
make decisions and execute plans within your intent, encourages initiative,
improves teamwork, and enhances morale.

I WILL BE FAIR AND IMPARTIAL WHEN RECOMMENDING BOTH REWARDS AND
PUNISHMENT.
A good leader always
faces the difficult balancing act between consistent, fair and impartial use of
rewards and punishments. You must be consistent in the enforcement of standards
and discipline, but you must also judge each action on its own merits.
As
I stated earlier, you do not lead all soldiers in the same way. You must
correctly assess your soldiers' competence, motivation, and commitment so that
you can take the proper leadership actions at the correct time. For example, a
soldier with a new job or task normally needs closer supervision than an
experienced soldier at that same job or task. A soldier with low confidence
needs your support and encouragement.
Rewards and punishments have
different purposes. Rewards promote desired behavior; punishments reduce
undesired behavior. Soldiers who work hard and do their jobs efficiently deserve
your praise; soldiers who intentionally fail to follow your guidance or meet
clear standards may need reprimanding.
Rewards are visible evidence to
soldiers that their leaders, their unit, and their country appreciate their
courage or hard work. Well-chosen rewards normally increase soldiers' motivation
to keep working for more recognition.
Punishments for those soldiers who
intentionally fail to meet your standards or follow your guidance have just as
great an impact on the behavior you wish to modify as rewards do. However, you
must be careful with punishments. Don't punish soldiers who are unable to
perform a task; punish only those who are unwilling or unmotivated to
succeed.
You must also ensure that the soldiers you punish understand
exactly what behavior led to the punishment and that their behavior is your
primary concern. The punishment should neither be excessive nor unreasonable
since it is not the severity of the punishment that necessarily deters soldiers,
but the certainty of it.
The hope of reward and the fear of punishment
greatly affect soldiers' behavior. If you have received a pat on the back for
doing something well, or punishment for unsatisfactory performance, you know how
it felt and how it changed your future behavior.
As a leader, you must
create a climate that encourages your subordinates to actively participate and
want to help you accomplish the mission.
Key ingredients for developing
this relationship are mutual trust, respect, confidence, and the consistency
with which you dispense rewards and punishments. These have almost as much
impact upon the behavior of your soldiers as the rewards and punishments
themselves.
Back to
main
Paragraph One
Paragraph Two
Paragraph Four